Mulla Sadra, known also as Sadr al-Muta’allihin, was born in Shiraz, Iran, in
the year 1571-1572 AD and died in 1640 AD. His writings focus on philosophy and
commentaries on the Qur’an and Al-Usul Al-Kafi.
His most important philosophical
writings include Al-Assfar Al-Arba‘at Al-‘Aqliyyah, Al-Shawahid Al-Rububiyya, Al-Hikamat
Al-‘Arshiyya, Kitab Al-Masha‘ir, and Al-Mabda’ wa Al-Ma‘ad.
The present work consists of five chapters, written on two categories:
The
Transcendent Philosophy and Mulla Sadra's School, and Comparative Studies of
Mulla Sadra and Other Philosophers.
Several years of work has enabled me to
complete some parts of this project, which concerns the relation of Mulla Sadra
to the totality of the Islamic tradition, and the characteristics of his
‘Transcendent Philosophy’ being used in its original sense.
Chapter One of this book discusses Mulla Sadra’s life, one of the greatest
Muslim Iranian philosopher and founding father of the ‘Transcendent Philosophy’.
Chapter Two discusses Mulla Sadra’s philosophy , entitled ‘Transcendent
philosophy’, in 3 sections:
the definition of ‘Transcendent philosophy’, the 16
principles of Mulla Sadra’s philosophy, and Mulla Sadra’s views on different
schools of thought, such as Ancient Metaphysicians, Greek and Muslim
philosophers.
This is an original work in the English language as it presents
the most important aspects of Mulla Sadra’s philosophy based directly on his
various writings in Arabic language, such as Assfar, al-Shawahid al-rububiyya,
al-Mabda’ wa l-Ma’ad, Arshiyyah, al-Masha'ir and Mafatih al-Ghayb.
Chapter Three is entitled ‘A Comparative Study of Aristotle and Mulla Sadra
Shirazi on the Necessary Existent’.
The nature of God, or the demiurge-creator
and designer of the cosmos, is a venerable subject in philosophy and natural
theology.
In the Abrahamic faiths, and especially within a philosophical
context, most medieval religious discussion about God, including the ontological
and cosmological proofs for His existence, stems from the famous proof of the
Prime Unmoved Mover in Aristotle’s Physics.
It was this proof, alongside later,
more ontological proofs, associated with Anselm and Avicenna, that underpinned
medieval philosophical theology.
For this reason it is instructive to trace the
development of philosophical theology from Aristotle through to the more
sophisticated arguments about God found in the later Islamic tradition.
In
tracing this development we can see the creative thought of the monotheists who
discuss God within a broadly Aristotelian context, and with reference to
Aristotelian axioms.
The present chapter begins with Aristotle’s theology – his
concept of God and His attributes – and then compares this architectonic,
foundational theology to the later theology of Mulla Sadra, which represents a
richer and more sophisticated concept of God, indicative of a mature and
confident Islamic philosophical tradition.
Chapter Four discusses Rumi and Mulla Sadra on Theoretical and Practical
Intellect.
Rumi (1207-1273) the great Persian sage identified approximately 34 different
varieties of intellect in his masterpiece Mathnawi. They may be categorised into
three main types:
1- Meta-theoretical and Practical intellect, also known as Universal Intellect
and First Intellect.
2- Theoretical intellect, used to perceive and distinguish between truth and
untruth. According to Rumi, theoretical intellect corresponds with faithful
intellect, perfect intellect, honourable intellect and Divine seeing intellect.
3- Practical intellect, which serves to distinguish between Good and Evil.
Rumi
held that practical intellect included material reason, resurrection intellect,
partial reason, popular reason, and brief reason.
According to Rumi everyone has intellect, and in a perfect man, intellect may
help him transcend Particular Reason to arrive at Universal intellect.
According to the great Iranian Muslim philosopher Mulla Sadra (979-1571), there
are four types of Theoretical and Practical intellect, all of which are based on
perfection.
Theoretical intellect ascends from “material intellect” (‘aql
hayuluni), “habitual intellect” (‘aql bi al-malakeh), “intellect in act” (‘aql
bi al-fi’l) to the “acquired intellect” (‘aql bi al mustafad).
Practical intellect may be divided into the following processes:
polishing/refinement of the apparent/outer part, polishing the inner part,
illuminating the heart, and annihilation of the soul from its essence.
According to Mulla Sadra’s transcendent philosophy, which is based on
“principality of Being” (asalat wujud), each act of knowing involves the being
of the knower, and the hierarchy of the faculties of knowledge correspond to the
hierarchy of existence. Reason is in its essence a Divine light.
Chapter Five, entitled ‘Mulla Sadra and Descartes On the Soul: A Philosophical
Comparison’, examines the philosophical views of Mulla Sadra and Descartes on
the soul. The comparison is divided into five main segments, as follows:
1. An Exposition of Mulla Sadra’s Discussion of the Soul
2. An Exposition of Descartes’ Discussion of the Soul
3. Similarities and Differences Between the Two
4. Strengths of Mulla Sadra’s Theory
5. Critiques of Descartes’ Theory
The foundation of Mulla Sadra’s theory is “the corporeality of contingency and
the spirituality of subsistence in relation to the soul.”
The foundation of
Descartes’ theory is “the real distinction between the substance of the soul and
the body.” Mulla Sadra’s theory includes a philosophical proof for physical
resurrection, whereas Descartes’ dualism led to the collapse of his
philosophical system.
This book is one of the best books in the English language on Mulla Sadra’s
philosophy and is useful for university students in the field of Islamic studies
and Islamic philosophy.